You are here

Whistleblower Cases

RSS
July 9, 2007
TBA-0023 - In the Matter of Franklin C. Tucker

This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on April 9, 2007, involving a Complaint of Retaliation filed by Franklin C. Tucker (also referred to as the employee or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In his Complaint, Tucker claims that his former employer, DOE contractor BWXT Y-12, L.L.C. (BWXT or the contractor), retaliated against him for engaging in activity that is protected by Part 708.

May 23, 2007
TBU-0068 - In the Matter of Delbert F. Bunch

Delbert F. Bunch (Bunch or the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dated September 6, 2006. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied.

May 16, 2007
TBU-0065 - In the Matter of Donald E. Searle

Donald E. Searle (Searle or the complainant) appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation and request for investigation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied.

May 10, 2007
TBU-0067 - In the Matter of Charles Montano

Charles Montano (the complainant), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. The complaint was dated January 30, 2007. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained, and the appeal denied.

May 9, 2007
TBA-0027 - In the Matter of Clint Olson

This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on October 27, 2005, involving a Complaint of Retaliation filed by Clint Olson (also referred to as the employee or the complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. Olson was an employee of BWXT Pantex (also referred to as BWXT, the firm, or the contractor), the Management and Operating Contractor at the DOE’s Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. In his Complaint, Mr.

April 9, 2007
TBH-0023 - In the Matter of Franklin C. Tucker

This Initial Agency Decision concerns a whistleblower complaint filed by Franklin C. Tucker (the Complainant) against his previous employer, BWXT Y-12, L.L.C. (BWXT) under the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. BWXT is the manager of Y-12, part of the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Nuclear Weapons Complex.

March 22, 2007
TBU-0061 - In the Matter of Misti Wall

Misti Wall (the complainant or Wall), appeals the dismissal of her complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager (Manager) at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA).

March 15, 2007
TBH-0042 - In the Matter of Curtis Hall

This Initial Agency Decision involves a whistleblower complaint filed by Mr. Curtis Hall (also referred to as the complainant or the individual) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The complainant was an employee of Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI), the prime contractor at the DOE’s Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. From January 10, 2005 until July 28, 2005, he was employed as a Controls & Instrumentation (C&I) Engineer to work at the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) being constructed at the Hanford Site.

March 13, 2007
TBU-0062 - In the Matter of Fredrick Abbott

Fredrick Abbott (the complainant or Abbott), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, I have determined that the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained and the appeal denied.

January 9, 2007
TBB-0049 - In the Matter of Gary S. Vander Boegh

This letter concerns the complaint of retaliation that you filed with the Department of Energy (DOE) under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. On September 6, 2006, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) received your petition for Secretarial review of the August 3 jurisdictional appeal decision issued by the OHA Director. Under the Part 708 regulations, the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of OHA only in extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.19.