You are here

Whistleblower Cases

RSS
April 9, 2007
TBH-0023 - In the Matter of Franklin C. Tucker

This Initial Agency Decision concerns a whistleblower complaint filed by Franklin C. Tucker (the Complainant) against his previous employer, BWXT Y-12, L.L.C. (BWXT) under the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. BWXT is the manager of Y-12, part of the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Nuclear Weapons Complex.

March 22, 2007
TBU-0061 - In the Matter of Misti Wall

Misti Wall (the complainant or Wall), appeals the dismissal of her complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager (Manager) at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA).

March 15, 2007
TBH-0042 - In the Matter of Curtis Hall

This Initial Agency Decision involves a whistleblower complaint filed by Mr. Curtis Hall (also referred to as the complainant or the individual) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The complainant was an employee of Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI), the prime contractor at the DOE’s Hanford Site in Richland, Washington. From January 10, 2005 until July 28, 2005, he was employed as a Controls & Instrumentation (C&I) Engineer to work at the Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) being constructed at the Hanford Site.

March 13, 2007
TBU-0062 - In the Matter of Fredrick Abbott

Fredrick Abbott (the complainant or Abbott), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, I have determined that the dismissal of the complaint should be sustained and the appeal denied.

January 9, 2007
TBB-0049 - In the Matter of Gary S. Vander Boegh

This letter concerns the complaint of retaliation that you filed with the Department of Energy (DOE) under 10 C.F.R. Part 708. On September 6, 2006, the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) received your petition for Secretarial review of the August 3 jurisdictional appeal decision issued by the OHA Director. Under the Part 708 regulations, the Secretary will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the Director of OHA only in extraordinary circumstances. 10 C.F.R. § 708.19.

December 19, 2006
TBU-0058 - In the Matter of Donald R. Rhodes

Donald R. Rhodes (Rhodes or the complainant) appeals the dismissal of his August 25, 2006 complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. He filed the complaint with the Whistleblower Program Manager (WP Manager) of the DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA/SC), located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. As explained below, the WP Manager’s November 16, 2006 dismissal of the complaint should be upheld, and the appeal denied.

November 29, 2006
TBU-0045 - In the Matter of William Cor

William Cor (the complainant or the employee), appeals the dismissal of his complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. As explained below, the dismissal of the complaint should be reversed and the matter remanded for further processing to the Whistleblower Program Manager at the National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA).

November 7, 2006
TBH-0030 - In the Matter of Curtis Broaddus

This Decision concerns a whistleblower complaint that Mr. Curtis Broaddus (the complainant) filed under the Department of Energy’s Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. The complainant is an employee of BWXT Pantex (BWXT), the management and operations contractor at the DOE’s Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas. The complainant contends that he made a number of disclosures that are protected under Part 708, and that BWXT retaliated against him for making those disclosures.

October 16, 2006
VBA-0083 - In the Matter of S.R. Davis

This Decision considers an Appeal of an Initial Agency Decision (IAD) issued on April 21, 2004, involving a complaint filed by S.R. Davis (also referred to as the Complainant) under the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program, 10 C.F.R. Part 708. In her Complaint, the Complainant claims that her former employer, Fluor Fernald, Inc. (the Contractor), retaliated against her for engaging in activity that is protected by Part 708.

October 12, 2006
TBU-0053 - In the Matter of

Felecia Broaddus (Broaddus or the complainant) appeals the dismissal of her July 18, 2006 complaint of retaliation filed under 10 C.F.R. Part 708, the Department of Energy (DOE) Contractor Employee Protection Program. She filed the complaint with the Whistleblower Program Manager (WP Manager) of the DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center (NNSA/SC), located in Albuquerque, New Mexico. As explained below, the WP Manager’s August 28, 2006 dismissal of the complaint should be upheld, and the appeal denied.