The Department issued a Federal Register Notice initiating preparations for development of the 2012 National Electric Transmission Congestion Study. DOE hosted four regional pre-study workshops in early December 2011 to receive input and suggestions concerning the study. DOE appreciates the comments that various individuals and organizations submitted.
The Department is preparing the 2012 Congestion Study now, and hosted three webinars in August 2012 to receive input and suggestions concerning the preliminary findings of the study. The presentation used in the webinars is now available. Later this year, DOE will release a draft of the study for public comment. DOE will publish a final version of the study after reviewing and considering comments on the draft study.
Section 216(a) of the Federal Power Act, as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, directs the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to conduct a study every three years on electric transmission congestion and constraints within the Eastern and Western Interconnections. The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) further directed the Secretary to include in the 2009 Congestion Study an analysis of significant potential sources of renewable energy that are constrained by lack of adequate transmission capacity. Based on this study, and comments concerning it from states and other stakeholders, the Secretary of Energy may designate any geographic area experiencing electric transmission capacity constraints or congestion as a national interest electric transmission corridor (National Corridor).
Congestion occurs on the nation’s electric transmission grids when actual or scheduled flows of electricity over a line or piece of equipment are constrained below desired levels. These restrictions may be imposed either by the physical or electrical capacity of the line or by operational directives that are created and enforced to protect the security and reliability of the grid. The term “transmission constraint” can refer to a piece of equipment that restricts power flows, to an operational limit imposed to protect reliability, or to a lack of transmission capacity to deliver electricity from existing or potential generation sources without violating reliability requirements.
Because wholesale power purchasers typically seek to buy the least expensive electricity available, if transmission constraints frequently limit the amount of electricity that can be delivered into an area where demand for it is high, the power purchasers must buy more often from higher-cost suppliers, and the result is higher electricity costs for consumers. In more severe congestion conditions, transmission constraints can impair grid reliability by reducing the diversity of available electricity supplies and rendering the area more vulnerable to unanticipated outages of major generators or transmission lines.
Low-level transmission congestion is very common, and it would not be economic or practical to eliminate all congestion. Broadly speaking, there are three ways to mitigate congestion where it is significant enough to merit remediation. These are: 1), reduce electricity demand in the congested area through energy efficiency and demand management programs; 2) build more generation capacity close to the demand area; and 3) build additional transmission capacity so as to enable more electricity to be delivered from distant generators. Electric system planners frequently find that a combination of the three approaches is most desirable.
DOE’s Congestion Studies may contribute information needed to support the future designation of one or more National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (National Corridors). On the basis of a congestion study, and after reviewing and considering public comments, the Secretary of Energy is authorized but not required to designate related geographic areas as National Corridors. Designation of a National Corridor has two effects: 1) it emphasizes that the Department considers the particular congestion problem to which the corridor pertains to be sufficiently acute to merit federal concern; and 2) it enables the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to exercise “backstop” authority (under conditions specified in the Federal Power Act) to approve the siting of transmission facilities within the area of the corridor. In particular, the Commission may exercise its jurisdiction if a state agency has “withheld approval” for more than one year of an application to site a transmission facility within the corridor.