Special Report: IG-0885

Management and Operating Contractors' Subcontract Audit Coverage

Office of Inspector General

April 17, 2013
minute read time

April 17, 2013

Management and Operating Contractors' Subcontract Audit Coverage

The Department of Energy (Department) employs 28 Management and Operating (M&O) contractors that perform essential mission work under cost reimbursable contracts.  To achieve the Department's mission, M&O contractors often utilize the services of subcontractors, which are also funded by the Department.  When these subcontracts are structured as cost-type, including time and materials, and cost reimbursable subcontracts, M&O contractors are contractually required to ensure that associated costs incurred are audited to provide assurance that the costs are allowable.  The M&O contractors may use their internal audit staff, engage contract auditors, or use the services of the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) to audit the subcontractors.  Internally performed audits must, at a minimum, meet professional standards prescribed by the Institute of Internal Auditors.  M&O contractors presumably rely on audits of subcontractors when completing required annual certifications that all of their incurred costs are allowable.  The Office of Inspector General identified contract management as a management challenge in its report on Management Challenges at the Department of Energy (DOE/IG-0874, October 2012).  The Department has committed to improving contract management and we recognize that such a significant issue requires a concerted effort over time.  The objective of this report is to highlight the issues we identified in previous reports and stress the need for a top-down emphasis to ensure that all M&O contractors develop robust procedures for subcontract audits. Between 2010 and 2012, the Office of Inspector General reported subcontract audit weaknesses with nine M&O contractors.  Subcontracts valued in excess of $906 million had not been audited or were reviewed in a manner that did not meet audit standards.  The subcontract costs were not audited because the Department did not ensure that its M&O contractors developed and implemented procedures to meet their contractual requirements.  For example, although the M&O contractors are contractually required to conduct or arrange for audits of their cost-type subcontracts, Los Alamos National Laboratory approved audit strategy only required audits of subcontracts with annual incurred costs that exceeded $15 million.  Under this threshold, only 2 of 1,404 subcontracts were required to be audited.  We noted that while some sites have taken action in response to our reports, we believe that a greater Department-wide emphasis on auditing cost-type subcontracts is needed.  In response to our report, management concurred with the findings and recommendations and agreed to take corrective actions.

Topic: Management & Administration