You are here

Product Efficiency Cases

RSS
August 11, 2005
TEE-0022 - In the Matter of Maytag Corporation

This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by Maytag Corporation (Maytag) seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part
430, Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Energy Conservation Standards for Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers and Freezers (Refrigerator
Efficiency Standards). In its exception request, Maytag asserts that the firm would suffer a gross inequity if required to adhere to the Refrigerator Efficiency Standards,

April 14, 2005
TEE-0013 - In the Matter of NORDYNE, Inc.

This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by NORDYNE, Inc. (NORDYNE), seeking exception relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 430,
pertaining to energy conservation standards for central air conditioners and heat pumps (Air Conditioner Standards). NORDYNE manufacturers air conditioning and
heating equipment for the residential, light commercial and manufactured housing markets. In its exception request, NORDYNE asserts that it will suffer a serious

October 14, 2004
TEE-0011 - In the Matter of Unico, Inc.

This Decision and Order considers Applications for Exception filed by SpacePak and Unico, Inc. (Unico), seeking exception relief from the provisions of in C.F.R. Part 430,
pertaining to energy conservation standards for central air conditioners and heat pumps (Air Conditioner Standards). SpacePak and Unico are manufacturers of small
duct, high velocity (SDHV) air conditioning equipment. In their exception requests, SpacePak and Unico assert that they will suffer a serious hardship and an unfair

October 14, 2004
TEE-0010 - In the Matter of SpacePak

This Decision and Order considers Applications for Exception filed by SpacePak and Unico, Inc. (Unico), seeking exception relief from the provisions of in C.F.R. Part 430,
pertaining to energy conservation standards for central air conditioners and heat pumps (Air Conditioner Standards). SpacePak and Unico are manufacturers of small
duct, high velocity (SDHV) air conditioning equipment. In their exception requests, SpacePak and Unico assert that they will suffer a serious hardship and an unfair

October 18, 2002
TEE-0003 - In the Matter of Emerson Motor Technologies

This Decision and Order considers an Application for Exception filed by Emerson Motor Technologies (Emerson), seeking relief from the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Part 431, Energy Efficiency Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment: Test Procedures, Labeling and Certification Requirements for Electric Motors. In

May 9, 2001
VEA-0018 - In the Matter of Whirlpool Corporation

This determination considers an Appeal filed by Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool) of a Decision and Order issued by the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) on March 2, 2001. Diversified Refrigeration, Inc., 28 DOE ¶ , Case No. VEE-0079 (March 2, 2001) (Diversified). In the Decision and Order, OHA granted Diversified Refrigeration, Inc. (DRI) a limited exception from the revised standards of 10 C.F.R.

March 2, 2001
VEE-0079 - In the Matter of Diversified Refrigeration, Inc.

Diversified Refrigeration, Inc. (DRI) requests a six-month exception from the 2001 energy appliance efficiency standards for built-in refrigerators that become effective July 1, 2001. As explained below, we are granting DRI a six-month exception - from July 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001 - that permits the firm to produce a specific number of non-compliant refrigerators per month and requires DRI to submit monthly reports on the number of each model produced.  

March 2, 2001
VEA-0017 - In the Matter of Whirlpool Corporation

Sub-Zero Freezer Co. (Sub-Zero), GE Appliances (GE), and Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool) filed appeals of our November 3, 2000 decision, granting Viking Range Corporation (Viking) a six-month exception from the 2001 energy appliance efficiency standards for built-in refrigerators. Viking Range Corp., 28 DOE ¶ 81,002 (2000). As discussed below, we have granted the appeals in part. As a result, the six-month exception will be limited to 475 refrigerators per month and will be subject to a monthly reporting requirement.

March 2, 2001
VEA-0016 - In the Matter of GE Appliances

Sub-Zero Freezer Co. (Sub-Zero), GE Appliances (GE), and Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool) filed appeals of our November 3, 2000 decision, granting Viking Range Corporation (Viking) a six-month exception from the 2001 energy appliance efficiency standards for built-in refrigerators. Viking Range Corp., 28 DOE ¶ 81,002 (2000). As discussed below, we have granted the appeals in part. As a result, the six-month exception will be limited to 475 refrigerators per month and will be subject to a monthly reporting requirement.

March 2, 2001
VEA-0015 - In the Matter of Sub-Zero Freezer Co.

Sub-Zero Freezer Co. (Sub-Zero), GE Appliances (GE), and Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool) filed appeals of our November 3, 2000 decision, granting Viking Range Corporation (Viking) a six-month exception from the 2001 energy appliance efficiency standards for built-in refrigerators. Viking Range Corp., 28 DOE ¶ 81,002 (2000). As discussed below, we have granted the appeals in part. As a result, the six-month exception will be limited to 475 refrigerators per month and will be subject to a monthly reporting requirement.